Search for: "Brett Doe"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who as a judge on the U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:02 am
" The evidence presented at Kimberlin's trial does not support this assertion. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
In Jeopardy format, here is the two-part answer to the question about the case to be discussed in this article:One, after then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh dissented on the issue currently before the Court when he was a member of the United State Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:52 pm
“The CAT order,” Hughes noted, “does not challenge the validity of the final order of removal. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 12:28 pm
My interest in the Twitter reaction to me began shortly after Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed to the Supreme Court in 2018. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal ‘All Traitors Must Die’: Feds charge man for threatening whistleblower attorney Politico – Natasha Bertrand | Published: 2/20/2020 Federal prosecutors in Michigan charged a man with making a death threat against one of the attorneys for a whistleblower who initiated the impeachment inquiry of President Trump. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:09 am
The post Argument analysis: Does prejudice matter? [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:00 pm
Trump Still Bothers to Lie: Does That Mean Something? [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:37 pm
(Technically, both she and Justice Brett Kavanaugh issued an opinion from the December sitting on February 25.) [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:55 am
Although the case does not directly implicate Roe, the justices’ ruling may signal what direction the Roberts Court is likely to take in future abortion cases. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am
And whether it it’s ultimately used does not matter because the First Amendment does not require us to rely on the grace of the executive branch. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 3:47 pm
American Trucking Associations, Justice Antonin Scalia noted that Congress “does not alter the fundamental details of a regulatory scheme in vague terms or ancillary provisions—it does not, one might say, hide elephants in mouseholes. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 3:39 pm
In a decision written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the court explained that McKinney’s argument that a jury, rather than a judge, should resentence him “does not square with” the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Clemons v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:20 am
Defending the leadership structure, Clement stresses that although the Constitution does not address the issue of removal, it does give Congress “substantial discretion” to structure the executive branch. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
” In an op-ed for the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter reviews Ruth Marcus’ recent book, “Supreme Ambition: Brett Kavanaugh and the Conservative Takeover. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:55 pm
In the latest episode of the Apps in Law podcast, Brett Burney interviews Kentucky attorney Stephen Embry to talk about the CES conference and consumer technology that is of interest to attorneys. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
The reality is that Morrison, especially since Justice Brett Cavanaugh replaced Justice Anthony Kennedy, most likely does not command five votes at the Court today.All of this leads to the second transcendently important reality about so many of today’s most divisive opinions about President Trump, namely, that whether his invocation of powers that are ordinarily permissible for Presidents to exercise can become morally and even legally problematic because a… [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 1:27 pm
If that doesn't qualify as an unconstitutional excessive delegation, it is difficult to see what does. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:32 pm
Based on a recent gathering of court-watchers and advocates I attended this past weekend, I think it’s safe to say that the smart money is on the court’s ultimately reaching something akin to then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s position in the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 8:55 am
The Constitution does not establish a set number of justices for the Supreme Court (or any court), and Congress can (and in the nineteenth century actually did) change their number at will. [read post]
