Search for: "CUSTODY OF S C"
Results 961 - 980
of 4,784
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2020, 9:27 am
At the Law Office of Vincent C. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
N.C., 137 S. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:23 pm
In the context of the emergency, the provisions in the Coronavirus Act 2020 Guidance on looked-after children and children’s hearings provisions, issued by the Scottish Parliament as an update to the Coronavirus (Scotland) Bill, are designed to enable best use of very limited resources by local authorities, and the children’s hearings system, so that efforts can be focused on safeguarding the welfare of Scotland’s most vulnerable children, and on… [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:08 am
C. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 6:06 pm
4-6, 24-48, 66); establishing a perimeter around a hazardous area to preserve public safety (R. c. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 8:42 am
The court treated the parties equally under factor (c) after deeming child support and "the additional support [Sarah] receives from her family" as "more than sufficient to meet [AB's] material needs. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:05 pm
Under the CARES Act, a tax-exempt organization described in Code section 501(c) and exempt from tax under Code section 501(a) is an eligible employer if it is engaged in a trade or business and undergoes a suspension (but not a gross receipts decline). [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 10:00 am
[C]ontinuing to introduce measures without review or evidence is dangerous and will create more problems than it solves. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:35 am
(c) Answer to Issue: No. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 2:32 pm
In cases not involving domestic violence, a party’s interference with custodial orders will be scrutinized. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:47 pm
Evid.801(c). [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:47 pm
Evid.801(c). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 6:24 am
(c) Answer to Issue: Clearly not. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 8:48 am
(c) Answer to Issue: Clearly not. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 5:58 am
There’s no obligation to inform your children’s other parent if you later get a gun…but if the children even remotely have access to the guns it’s a class C misdemeanor with a $1000 minimum fine. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
It’s not business as usual in Canadian courts. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:55 am
Hopefully the SEC’s guidance will be the first step in addressing this perceived ambiguity. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:59 pm
Allison C. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
What’s additionally shocking here: the statutory provision does not actually give the executive branch expulsion authority. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 7:29 am
“[C]ourts have held that a custody order which separates siblings is not considered to be in their best interests, but it can be under some circumstances. [read post]
