Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 961 - 980
of 34,263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2018, 9:04 am
Innovations, LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm
” Next, we explore the bounds of the Federal Arbitration Act, with a pair of petitions arguing that California’s efforts to restrict arbitration agreements undermine federal law. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 1:13 am
While Roberts was on appeal, the California Supreme Court handed down its decision in McGill v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:54 pm
But the California Supreme Court, in Pearson Dental Supplies v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:43 am
Under Grutter v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:46 pm
You pled guilty (or are convicted) to lewd acts upon someone under 16 (or 14), so pursuant to Megan's Law, your name and picture is on California's sex offender website. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:49 pm
The California Supreme Court recently held in People v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:34 pm
In Frlekin, et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
§2254(d) if the California Supreme Court is deemed to have ruled on the question and under the rule of Teague v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:54 pm
Heller (2008) and in McDonald v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:02 am
In Sander v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 8:51 am
In April 2018, the California Supreme Court turned worker classification on its head when it decided Dynamex Operations West Inc v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm
§ 9003(c) and California law governing service and filing adequate proof of service by July 12, 2023. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
In an opinion filed July 3, 2014, the California Supreme Court provided some clarification to California law concerning an architect's liability to foreseeable third-party purchasers of residential units for design errors and omissions. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:32 am
Swift will resolve a hot debate about the scope of implied disparagement liability under California law. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 6:55 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:54 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court granted review in Sanchez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:35 am
There, the Upper Deck co. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:28 am
Here is the opinion in American Property Management Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:24 am
In 2008, the Supreme Court of California considered an employer’s drug policies in conjunction with an employee’s lawful use of medical marijuana (Ross v. [read post]
