Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 961 - 980
of 4,400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm
., JAWS)) Alternate non-Scantron answer sheet Marking answer choices in the test book Use of line marker Use of magnification devices (e.g., magnification reading glasses, handheld video magnifier, closed-circuit television (CCTV), ZoomText) Use of adaptive writing instruments (e.g., thick or felt-tip pen/marker, pencil grips) Other types accommodations that are not format-related include extra time on the writing sample, the use of spell check, or stop-the-clock breaks. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:42 am
In her words, “Schutt was commissioned by the University of California to paint comparative series of locally farmed apples”. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Batson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am
President Nixon was forced to turn over the Watergate tapes to the special prosecutor (U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
| Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
The prosecution had alleged that jurisdiction applied even though the defendants used intermediaries residing in California who made sales presentations in California and sold the securities from California to individuals who did not reside in Kansas (State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
The history of its inception is described by Joanna Lydgate in a 2010 article in the California Law Review. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
Vishnu Kannan and Margaret Taylor summarized Friday’s oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 5:57 am
Oh, Mark F. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Stanford Law Professor Mark LemleyMark A. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:47 am
Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
Marks v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:35 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Encino Motocars, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
Considerations for a farm-to-table approach to Reducing the Risk of E. coli O157:H7/STEC Associated with Leafy GreensThe leafy greens sector has invested a great deal of resources in the development and implementation of initiatives such as the California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement (LGMA) and the Arizona LGMA. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:23 pm
California, from way back in 1966. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Among the cases he worked on in the 1953 term was Barsky v. [read post]
