Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 961 - 980
of 12,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:16 pm
For a court to be bound by a decision of the United States Supreme Court, rather than the California Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court must have decided the same question differently. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:50 pm
For over 20 years, Kerry has represented the construction and building materials industry on mineral extraction and land development projects, and has secured entitlements for the largest federally-approved sand and gravel project in the United States, obtained the first-ever vested rights confirmation from the State of California for the largest construction aggregate deposit in California, and successfully represented clients before the Ninth Circuit… [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm
SWRCB adopted the Procedures in April 2019 to supplement state-perceived gaps in federal Clean Water Act regulation for proposed discharges of dredged or fill material to broadly defined “waters of the state,” including all wetlands within California – not just wetlands considered “Waters of the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:26 am
Plaintiffs in Sanchez v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:26 pm
When SCOTUS granted cert in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Coverage continues of the Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 10:54 am
The luxury goods manufacturer began selling its luggage in France in 1854 and in the United States in 1893. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its highly-anticipated ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 10:04 am
On June 30, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States agreed to hear an appeal in Friedrichs v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 3:43 pm
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348 (Iskanian) precluded enforcement of PAGA waivers, but asserted that Iskanian was wrongly decided and in any event was no longer good law in light of the 2018 opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:30 am
United States v. $33,020.00 in United States Currency, 2010 U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:04 pm
See United Steelworkers v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
The same holds true today; California remains the only state to have recognized such an exception. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm
Due to the unforeseen unavailability of a panel member, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had to postpone the Epic Games v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court began to address some of the unanswered questions in People v. [read post]
