Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 961 - 980
of 51,865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 11:56 am
Especially if (as is often the case) the reversal is thought by those reversed to be both erroneous and overly dismissive. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:14 am
In Cole v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
[This seems to jive pretty well with the other recent capital murder case on this issue, Luna v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:38 pm
On the merits, I initially agreed with the majority opinion by Justice Woods in this case. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 12:38 pm
Which is fairly rare.But, then again, this is a pretty rare case. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:05 pm
In People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:40 pm
In a brief filed in Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:50 pm
I'm not at all confident that this judgment will be a favorable one.At the same time, defenders of our contemporary practices will point to cases like this one as why we did what we did.Anyway, a distressing case. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 1:00 pm
As well as how much rides on that determination.A depressing case on every level. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 8:23 am
Many death penalty cases are relatively straightforward, at least in terms of motivation or why and how things went down as they did. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 1:38 pm
The case is Lee v. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 4:59 am
Supreme Court upheld in Husted v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm
But consider what one Justice said during oral argument in a different death penalty case, Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 1:35 pm
Or, alternatively, you can watch paint dry.For a slightly more exciting case, you could instead read an opinion from a couple of weeks ago that amply demonstrates that clients are sometimes their own worst enemy. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
I'd have been stunned -- truly, remarkably stunned -- had the California Supreme Court done anything other than what it did in this incredibly high-profile case. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:54 pm
It's not the most heinous set of crimes ever, but, still, I'll be happy for the defendant to spend some time in the big house.I mention the case only because it doesn't make the probation department -- at least in L.A. -- look good. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 1:55 pm
At this point, we're straight up dismissing criminal cases for routinely failing to bring 'em to trial within the statutory deadline, and the Court of Appeal today affirms that decision for 44 different defendants.We really, really need more judges out there. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
You read the first two pages of this opinion, which describe the basic facts of the case, and (if you're like me) you think to yourself: "Good. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:50 pm
You can tell this case took a long time to work its way through the criminal justice system because one of the principal issues on appeal is whether it was permissible to introduce the alleged gang member defendant's MySpace page at his trial.I'm not thinking that there are many "original O.G.'s" with MySpace pages anymore.Even fewer after this opinion. [read post]
