Search for: "Christy, Appeal of" Results 961 - 980 of 1,172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: thousands of tweeters have repeated the bombing joke in support of paul chambers, who lost his appeal against conviction http://j.mp/9jZKcG i think this is compliment of chris christie ... [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:11 pm
The proceeding is usually recorded by a court reporter so that it can be appealed at a later time. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 11:42 am by B.W. Barnett
On appeal, the 13th District Court of Appeals (Corpus Christie) held that the defendant’s federal due process rights were violated by the late notice of the State’s intent to enhance the conviction. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:53 am by Don Cruse
Thirteenth Court: Perkes defeats Yañez The only incumbent to lose was Linda Yañez of the Thirteenth Court of Appeals (in Corpus Christi/Edinburg), who had first been appointed to the Court in 1993. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:40 pm by Alain Leibman
The court of appeals easily batted away the personal-knowledge objection made at trial, since the same agent had oversight for all thirty investigations. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:39 am by B.W. Barnett
  The 13th District Court of Appeals (Corpus Christie) reversed the trial court’s ruling that the indictment did not require tolling language and dismissed the prosecution as being time-barred, holding that:a defect of substance is harmful per se.The CCA then granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in disregarding CCA precedent, Tita v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:12 am
 Laetitia, it should be known, has worked as an Examiner in OHIM's Trade Marks Department and as a Legal Assistant to the Boards of Appeal. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:29 am by Beth Graham
  The Corpus Christi Appeals Court denied The Boot Jack’s writ of mandamus (In re 24R, Inc., ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:37 am by B.W. Barnett
On appeal, however, the 13th District Court of Appeals (Corpus Christie) reversed the conviction, holding that the evidence was legally insufficient to show that Appellant’s calls were made with the intent to influence the outcome of the criminal proceeding. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 7:29 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is discussed by the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals case, Warrilow v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:12 am by B.W. Barnett
On appeal to the 13th District Court of Appeals (Corpus Christie), Appellant argued that the manner and means the Appellant employed were not actually unknown as there was testimony at trial regarding possible strangulation and use of a stun gun, and that the jury charge was erroneous in authorizing conviction on an “unknown” theory. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:53 am by Sergio Leal
—Corpus Christi 2009, pet filed.), the Texas Court of Appeals reversed the lower trial court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of State Farm with respect to certain water damage. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:18 am by Scott Stewart
Christy's new husband, Steven Jackson, filed a petition to adopt the two children--Christy and ex-husband Robert both consented to the adoption. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 12:28 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
This is a Corpus Christi, Court of Appeals case that was affirmed in 2002 by the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:30 pm by Robert Tanha
I concur with the comments of Christie et al., supra, and recognize that there is a need to safeguard the employee’s reliance and expectation interests in inducement situations. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm by Susan Brenner
Dixon, 2010 WL 3419231 (Texas Court of Appeals 2010) and this is how it arose: David Herrera, a former employee of the Christus Spohn Health Systems, was shopping at the Corpus Christi Wholesale Mart with his sister when he noticed a black cell phone that resembled an Apple iPod laying on a pair of pants. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
" Then, citing a 1965, Corpus Christi Court of Appeals case, they stated, "Generally, the criterion for determining whether property is "in charge of" the insured within such an exclusion is the insured's right to exercise dominion or control over the property. [read post]