Search for: "Crop v. Crop"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm
A few weeks ago, the Court called for the views of the solicitor general on the certiorari petition in the case of Bowman v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:43 am
A few weeks ago, the Court called for the views of the solicitor general on the certiorari petition in the case of Bowman v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Venancio Aguasanta Arias, et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:50 am
A sentencing issue crops up in State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:50 am
The transcript of the Day Two argument makes a number of references to Wickard v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:47 pm
Saflufenacil product (Sharpen, Optill, or Verdict) plus MSO (1% v/v) plus either glyphosate or Ignite Along with the burndown treatment the weed specialists urge you to use a residual herbicide. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 10:47 am
In the 1845 case Waddill v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
TITLE V–GEOSPATIAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Sec. 501. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
- Providing of food and drink; Pubs; Restaurant and bar services [Description of Mark: The mark consists of a three-dimensional server uniform comprising the following elements: a white, cropped, camp-shirt-style blouse featuring half-length sleeves notched at the hem, a flat collar with pointed tips, and long center-tie closure, underneath which is a red, black, blue, yellow, and white tartan plaid bikini-style top, below which is a bare midriff and a thigh-length… [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:03 pm
See Adams v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:56 am
You can read the full opinion at Organic Producers et al v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 1:34 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:22 pm
Consider Wickard v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
Because of the outcome of the present proceedings, however, this point does not need to be discussed in more detail.[3.3] Claim 1 of the impugned patent, which is directed at a crop protection composition, formulated as powder, granules or as a liquid, aqueous suspension, contains two disclaimers. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:16 pm
Bank v. [read post]
