Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C" Results 961 - 980 of 4,548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
This list includes (among others) (i) publicly traded companies, (ii) 501(c) tax exempt entities under the Internal Revenue Code, (iii) certain pooled investment vehicles, (iv) any entity that (a) employs more than 20 employees on a full-time basis in the United States, (b) filed in the previous year's federal income tax returns more than $5,000,000 in gross receipts or sales in the aggregate (including the receipts or sales of other entities owned by the entity and other entities… [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
§ 2310(d)(3)(C) that the number of named plaintiffs equal or exceed one hundred. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Hodge court concluded otherwise, stating “the UCL provides only for equitable remedies,” “[d]amages are not available. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Estimable v. irreparable seems like another axis worth thinking about, as does discrete v. ongoing behavior. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:22 pm
Manchester City Council v Moran & Richards v Ipswich Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 378 This is a very important Court of Appeal judgment, which will have significant impact on Women’s Refuges and women fleeing domestic violence. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
(Ground 3) iii) Even if the Pinnock exception might otherwise apply, the county court judge erred in not allowing the Appellant’s case under Article 8 to proceed to trial. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 5:57 am by Matthew C. Bouchard, Esq.
#480492765 / gettyimages.com In September 2013, I blogged about the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals (“COA”) in Christie v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 5:57 am by Matthew C. Bouchard, Esq.
Embed from Getty Images In September 2013, I blogged about the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals (“COA”) in Christie v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:00 pm
Bahktiari opinion -- holding that parties to a mediated settlement agreement must include in it an express provision that they intend to be bound thereby -- and Simmons v. [read post]