Search for: "D-J Three Inc"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2008, 9:45 am
Cohen, David J. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
§ 21.001; AutoZone, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:31 pm
Defendant, BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
” Dyk, J., dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Fed. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
J. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(Spicy IP) Section 3(d) Patents Actand utility model (Spicy IP) The polymorphism of trade mark dilution in India (Spicy IP) Montenegro IP Office of Montenegro functional since 28 May 2008 - term for validation is 28 November 2008 (RelatIP) Nigeria Nigeria textile industry under threat from China fakes (Afro-IP) Norway Use on foreign-language website fails to save Munch mark (Class 46) Poland Polish minister of sport's plans to sell… [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am
” See, D. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In many others, where the risk is still emerging, D&O insurers are watching the developments closely. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
ICON Health &Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545, 553 (2014), and the text of the CTA is wide-ranging inscope. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:29 am
By Seth D. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm
”[11] Applying the law to the facts before it, the Second Circuit then applied a deferential standard to conclude that the district court’s decision not to require direct evidence was not outside “the range of permissible decisions” and thus was not reversible.[12] In particular, the Second Circuit explained that all seven of the indirect factors considered by the district court (the first four Cammer factors and the three Krogman factors) weighed so decisively in… [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
OPINION DELIVERED: March 6, 2015 THE ISSUE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT ATTRACTED TWO AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS Docket Sheet: The Fredericksburg Care Company LP v Perez No. 13-0573 TEXT OF THE TEXAS STATUTE FOUND PREEMPTED BY THE FAA SUBCHAPTER J. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
President & Fellows of Harvard College, 323 F.Supp.2d 151 (D. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
ROODVOETS, JON D. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
” The Supreme Court set forth three simple Revlon triggers: “(1) when a corporation initiates an active bidding process seeking to sell itself or to effect a business reorganization involving a clear break-up of the company; (2) where, in response to a bidder’s offer, a target abandons its long-term strategy and seeks an alternative transaction involving the break-up of the company; or (3) when approval of a transaction results in a sale or change of control. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:39 pm
DENNIS J. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:06 am
District Judge Amy J. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 2:25 pm
Kenny, decided May 10, 2019 by the Appeals Court of Massachusetts (Judges Peter J. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
The Commission devoted significant resources to evaluating its enforcement program in 1972.[9] In January 1972, Chairman William Casey created a three-member committee to “examine the SEC’s enforcement policy and practices, engage in frequent dialogue with the members of the Commission and with our staff, seek and sift the suggestions of the bar and make recommendations to the Commission for worthwhile improvements to our time-honored ways. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Sapphire filed suit against Adams Insurance Services, Inc., Arthur J. [read post]
