Search for: "Daily v. Daily"
Results 961 - 980
of 14,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 3:27 am
” WLR Daily, 5th April 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:30 am
” WLR Daily, 19th April 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:10 am
” WLR Daily, 29th October 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:35 am
” WLR Daily, 13th April 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 2:12 am
R (Pereira) v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:20 am
” WLR Daily, 26th February 2008 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:02 am
” WLR Daily, 30th March 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Cathie and another v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2012] EWCA Civ 739; [2012] WLR (D) 168 “In the context of determining whether to disqualify a company director for misconduct in the direction of an insolvent company the use of the expression ‘exceptional circumstances’ was better avoided. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:54 am
” WLR Daily, 22nd May 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:14 am
The statutory rule disenfranchising a citizen who had not resided in the UK for 15 years (‘the 15 year rule’) did not infringe the freedom of European Union citizens to move to other member states of the union.” WLR Daily, 25th October 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
E v English Province of Our Lady of Charity and another [2012] EWCA Civ 938; [2012] WLR (D) 204 “In a case in which a Roman Catholic parish priest was said to have abused a young girl, and the question arose, as to potential vicarious liability, whether he was an employee, independent contractor, or in some other manner to be considered akin to an employee, the law as to vicarious liability was to be extended such that the question should be approached in a broader way, and also by… [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:41 am
R v C [2009] UKHL 42; [2009] WLR (D) 272 “The words of s 30(2)(a) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 ‘or for any other reason’ were wide enough to include an irrational fear preventing the free exercise of choice, and inability to communicate the choice made within s 30(2)(b) was not limited to physical inability. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:34 am
Tann v Herrington [2009] EWHC 445 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 89 “Where a partner entrusted with the responsibility of dealing with all aspects of the firm's professional indemnity insurance failed to fulfil his obligations, a liability in damages to a client, for which the firm's professional indemnity insurer had refused indemnity, was a liability to be [...] [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:22 am
R v K(A) [2009] EWCA Crim 1640; [2009] WLR (D) 269 “A party to ancillary relief proceedings was not entitled to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination to withhold information about his income and assets that exposed him to a risk of prosecution but since he would in those circumstances be acting under compulsion the information he [...] [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 3:35 am
R v Ghulam; [2009] WLR (D) 303 “The word ‘determination’ in s 4(6) of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 refers only to a determination that a defendant is unfit to plead so that, where that provision's requirement for evidence from two or more registered medical practitioners to be before the court has not been met, [...] [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 2:46 am
Michel v The Queen [2009] UKPC 40; [2009] WLR (D) 312 “A defendant's right to a fair trial was absolute and he was entitled to explain his case, however improbable, without constantly being subjected to the judge's sarcasm and hostility. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
R v Seddon; [2009] WLR (D) 88 “In a European arrest warrant which sought a defendant's return to this jurisdiction as a convicted person for the extradition offence of blackmail an allegation that the defendant was unlawfully at large and in breach of bail did not amount to ‘an offence disclosed by the information provided … [...] [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:54 am
See, Sicilano v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:05 am
Regina (T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; Regina (R) Same [2012] EWHC 1115 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 126 “The decision of the Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis to issue and serve warning notices to those who had been accused of harassment or stalking by means of a Prevention of Harassment Letter or a Police Information Notice, and the retention of the documents or the underlying allegations in police records thereafter, could not give rise to any infringement… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
Auto 24 SARL v Jaguar Land Rover France SAS (Case C-158/11); [2012] WLR (D) 175 “It had to be possible to verify the precise content of ‘specified criteria’ upon which a quantitative selective distribution system in the motor vehicle sector was granted pursuant to article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle… [read post]
