Search for: "Discovery Benefits, Inc." Results 961 - 980 of 1,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2014, 4:30 am by Juan C. Antúnez
., plaintiffs entrusted her with some $19 million to invest on their behalf, and they remained her clients when she later left Goldman to join Lehman Brothers, Inc. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 2:45 am by Lorene Park
This was enough to avoid summary judgment (Di Gioia v Independence Plus, Inc). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:19 am by Jarod Bona
Many district courts are applying a summary-judgment or trial-like standard to motions to dismiss, despite the fact that the complaints at that stage are constructed without the benefits of discovery. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Executives should be encouraged to take prudent risks for the benefit of the company and its constituents, and should not be stymied by the fear of personal liability if a decision ultimately harms the company. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Executives should be encouraged to take prudent risks for the benefit of the company and its constituents, and should not be stymied by the fear of personal liability if a decision ultimately harms the company. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:05 am by WIMS
 Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Cassie Preston
Elk Run Coal Company, Inc., et al. (4th Cir. 2014); Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc., v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:35 pm by Jason Starling
Mattel, Inc. in which the Court, in dicta, casted doubt on whether “manifest disregard for the law” was a valid basis for vacating an arbitrator’s award. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am by Jay Yurkiw
The parties agreed that based on the low volume of relevant documents expected to be produced in discovery by the plaintiffs, “the cost of using predictive coding assistance would likely be outweighed by any practical benefit of its use. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:04 am by emagraken
Justice Hood observed in Scuzzy Creek Hydro & Power Inc. v. [read post]