Search for: "Doctor v. State"
Results 961 - 980
of 8,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2013, 2:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:33 am
The Court, citing the United States Supreme Court precedent of Roe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
For example, the court in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
McCall v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:30 pm
The initial survey planned to sample over 4,000 doctors in nine states and was expected to cost $347,370. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 8:50 pm
In Beckwith v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:46 pm
In today’s case (Minhas v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
The Lower Court's Entry of Summary Judgment in Carnival's Favor At the lower State Court level, Carnival relied upon the long line of decisions exemplified by Barbetta v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm
A recent study found that 25-44 percent of pregnant people seeking an abortion in Alabama had to travel out of state, even before Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 1:43 pm
In Witbart v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:04 am
In Delarama v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
The case of Gee v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:29 am
” [9] The Court also noted that the English courts (in subsequent cases such as Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust and Chester v Afshar) had quietly ceased to follow Sidaway‘s adoption of the Bolam test. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 10:00 pm
The doctor states that this incident "aggravated the back condition. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The 5th Circuit previously ruled in Missouri v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:19 am
” Smith v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:31 am
In 2019, the Kansas Supreme Court ruled in Hodes & Nauser v Schmidt that the Kansas Constitution protects a fundamental right to personal autonomy, which includes the right to decide whether to continue a pregnancy. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 11:13 am
For instance, the FTC cites 1975’s Goldfarb v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 7:32 am
Back on March 11, The Indiana Supreme Court handed down its opinion (PDF format) in Central Indiana Podiatry v. [read post]
