Search for: "Dodd v. State"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2023, 7:34 am
Most banks in the country do not service cannabis companies as marijuana remains illegal at the federal level despite several states legalizing its medicinal and recreational use. . . . [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 7:31 pm
The continuing high levels of tips may be attributed to continuing impact from the February 2018 Supreme Court decision in Digital Realty v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Bills that passed: The Agricultural Credit Act of 2009 would reauthorize state agricultural mediation programs under title V of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
As of August 31, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including six Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, three judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and one judge for the United States District Courts. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:15 am
The very concept of “debtor-in-possession” suggests a belief in the chance of renewal which is absent from the “receivership style” of insolvency prevalent outside the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:32 pm
In the landmark case of Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:50 am
Walmart announced in its 10-Q that based upon a compliance review and other sources (Dodd-Frank whistleblowers maybe?) [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
Delaware Court Questions Disclosure-Only Settlement of Merger Objection Lawsuit: As discussed here, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
In a separate Concept Release,[2] the SEC stated that it is reviewing interpretive issues under Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 4:15 am
How can one expect a state like that to hold together? [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
The decision in Murray v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
Karp and Sabastian V. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:49 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:10 am
Posted by William Magnuson, Texas A&M Law School, on Wednesday, September 13, 2017 Tags: Algorithmic trading, Banks, Bitcoin, Crowdfunding, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Financial reporting, Financial technology, Innovation, International governance, Market efficiency, Moral hazard, SIFIs, Systemic risk OCC Stakes Out a Lead Role in Establishing New… [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:09 am
Posted by Ron Kaniel, University of Rochester Simon Business School, on Monday, October 2, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Agency costs, Asset management, Bonuses, Fund performance, Incentives, Institutional Investors, International governance, Management, Mutual funds, Pay for performance, Sweden Delaware’s Loss of Top Spot for Lawsuit Climate Posted by Ning Chiu, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Monday, October 2, 2017 … [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:35 am
Carter and Karla Bos, Teneo Governance, on Sunday, February 19, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Engagement, Glass Lewis, Institutional Investors, ISS, Proxy advisors, Proxy season, Proxy voting, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting, Social media Gordon v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:00 am
Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
