Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 961 - 980
of 2,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2011, 10:37 am
Patent No. 5,597,767 does not incorporate by reference U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:35 pm
Nos. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:08 pm
DCA decision --- So. 3d ---, (Fla. 5th DCA 2011), Nos. 5D09-1488, 5D09-2091). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:41 pm
Pflueger, Nos. 30369 & 30419, affirming the circuit court’s denial of Mr. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm
Specifically, the ALJ found that Apple does not infringe various claims of U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:38 am
" Moreover, use of the "TM" designation does not make unregistrable matter registrable. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:29 pm
City of Los Angeles, Nos. 14-55014, 14-55050 (9th Cir. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:50 pm
Patent Nos. 6,275,213 and 6,424,333, both entitled "Tactile feedback man-machine interface device"); counterclaims seeking declaratory judgments of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability asserted by defendant, but a jury found the patents not invalid and infringed by the defendant; "exclusive licensee" (third party) involvement in patent infringement case; licensee only has rights to software claims, but the patent claims require software and hardware claims;… [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:11 am
Nos. 12-525-LPS and 12-526... [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 12:36 pm
. , Cause Nos: 08-5254/55/56/57/58/59/60/61/62/63/64/65/66/67/68/69/70/71/72/73 (6th Cir. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 8:37 am
” However, as this decision demonstrates, just because a government contractor is a prevailing party does not necessarily mean that the company is entitled to recover EAJA fees. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:10 am
Patent Nos. 6,309,053; 6,398,347; 6,412,917; 6,481,817; and 6,402,279, on the grounds that no respondents offered any invalidity defense for these patents and the time for discovery and initial expert reports had passed. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Soliciting advice after the fact from the clerk's office does not absolve a party from failing to acquaint oneself with the rules before filing. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 10:01 am
Patent Nos. 8,626,314 and 8,036,756 (“the Medtronic Patents”) for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 May 2021, 3:11 am
(See generally NYSCEF Doc Nos. 51, 53, Transcript and Decision.) [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 3:00 pm
Sources: Commission Guidance Regarding Proxy Voting Responsibilities of Investment Advisers Release Nos. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:25 pm
Clark, Nos. 295809 and 295810, the Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court’s decision to reverse the district court’s bindover ruling, and remanded the case for further proceedings. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:20 am
State, Nos. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 10:45 am
Instead they only said that Defeo "does business in . . . has caused harm in . . and the conduct . . . complained of . . . has occurred in this judicial district. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 4:18 pm
" From ALP: In this denial of a petition for rehearing of a habeas denial, Nos. 01-3250/3300 Poindexter v. [read post]
