Search for: "Doe v. ATTORNEY" Results 961 - 980 of 36,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
BUSHMAN, Attorney at Law, JANET CALLAGHAN, EILEEN DEGREGORIO, STEVI BROOKS NICHOLS, JEFFREY LEVITT, ESQ., Attorney at Law, HERBERT MONTE LEVY, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF HERBERT MONTE LEVY, ESQ., JOHN DOE, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF JOHN DOE, ESQ., JANE DOE, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF JANE DOE, ESQ  the end of years of litigation appears. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, a representation of opinion or a prediction of something which is hoped or expected to occur in the future does not sustain an action to recover damages for fraud (see Chase Invs. v Kent, 256 AD2d 298, 299). [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:00 am by Brian A. Comer
ComerThis case brief involves an action brought by South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster against a pharmaceutical company, captioned State v. [read post]
24 May 2006, 10:02 am
[JURIST] US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales [official profile] has said the government does not need court approval to obtain domestic telephone records because they are not protected by the US Constitution's Fourth Amendment [text] according to the Supreme Court's 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 6:45 am by Russell Knight
In Illinois, there are two different ways to ask your spouse, ex-spouse or child’s other parent for attorney’s fees: interim attorney’s fees and a contribution to attorney’s fees. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:46 am by Patricia Hughes
In some cases, internal limits have been read into the guarantee, making it easier for government to justify the infringement (see, for example, Withler v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:31 pm
That is, until the Court of Appeal came down with its decision in the case of SB Liberty, LLC, v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The affirmation in support is defective, because when an attorney represents himself, he must provide an affidavit and not an affirmation (see Slavenberg Corp. v Opus Apparel, Inc, 53 NY2d 799 [1981], citing Schutzer v Suss-Kolyer, 57 AD 2d 613). [read post]