Search for: "Doe v. United States"
Results 961 - 980
of 39,454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
In Cash v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:55 am
This provision does not use the phrase “Officers of the United States,” and it is not clear whether recess appointees are “Officers of the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 2:11 pm
Earlier this year, on June 6, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Gallardo v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:12 pm
Recently, in Driscoll v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:11 am
As the United States Supreme Court recognized, jeopardy does not attach to charges dismissed prior to the empaneling of a jury. [read post]
Randolph does not give a potential defendant veto power over a search where he has to be asked first
7 Jul 2008, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:21 pm
Under this exception, sovereign immunity does not bar a lawsuit “based on a commercial activity carried on in the United States by [a] foreign state. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am
Where section 12(1) of the SIA does not apply, the status quo of State immunity provided for in section 1 of the SIA must prevail. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
United States? [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 2:30 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 11:05 am
” But the position of the United States government in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 1:20 pm
United States, 273 U.S. 95 (1927). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:14 am
Doe (1982), Yick Wo v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Supreme Court, however, Trump does not press the “under the United States” Positions Clause argument. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
The Court held that, absent a government appeal or cross-appeal, a court of appeals does not have the power to sua sponte raise a defendant’s sentence, even if it is to correct a plain error. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:51 am
United States, holding that section 924(c)'s requirement of consecutive sentences does not apply when conviction is under section 924(j). [read post]
