Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 961 - 980
of 3,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Defamation Act 2013: A summary and overview six years on, Part 1, Sections 1 to 3 – Brett Wilson LLP
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm
This post deals with sections 1 to 3. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 7:42 am
Note that 54(1) and 54(2) are parallel to 35 U.S.C. 102(a) while 54(3) is parallel to 102(a)(2) which the IPO does not propose to change. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:50 am
Table 1. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:57 am
It was nevertheless undisputed that the claimed invention does not enjoy those older priority dates and that document D4 belongs to the prior art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC.2.1 Document D4 discloses (see claims 1 and 15) the use of vortioxetine for the treatment of depression, anxiety, abuse and chronic pain. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
How does your firm’s use compare? [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
A summary of existing FTTs can be found in Table 1. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
Specific taxation does not require valuation and as such does not require expensive tax administration, as is the case for ad valorem where vertically integrated companies must compute a value to determine tax liability. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:55 pm
Ameritech Corp., 2003 WI 54, ¶34, 262 Wis. 2d 32, 662 N.W.2d 652).It "precludes parties under certain circumstances from eschewing the more limited contract remedies and seeking tort remedies. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 10:23 am
Namely, the rule resulting from Canada Post is that employers do not have a duty to inspect spaces over which it does not exercise control. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:22 pm
" … [54.] [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:40 pm
Claims 1 and 6 of the granted patent read as follows:"1. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:56 pm
See paragraphs 54 and 55. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:22 am
The latest edition of the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, which entered into force on 1 November 2019, has removed the purposive selection criterion from the test (see section G-VI, 8(ii)). [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:14 am
Washington's Office of Minority & Women's Business Enterprises 54 Fed. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:10 am
The Board does, unfortunately, not discuss other case law that does give (or at least seems to give) a meaning to the term "closest", e.g., by using terminology such as "most promising" springboard (see e.g. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm
Rather, its powers derive from sections 60(2)(c) and (d) and 63(1) and 63(4) of the Judges Act (it is constituted under section 59 of the Judges Act). [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
By contrast, in the post-Cyan period between March 31, 2018 and October 31, 2019, only 32% of Section 11 liability actions were filed in federal court alone, while 25% were filed in state court only, and a whopping 54% were file [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
By contrast, in the post-Cyan period between March 31, 2018 and October 31, 2019, only 32% of Section 11 liability actions were filed in federal court alone, while 25% were filed in state court only, and a whopping 54% were filed [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:56 pm
Books Read (in order read)1. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 2:06 am
This court, confronting the same issue as the court of first instance of Vigo, decided to refer the following questions to the CJEU: Is national legislation such as paragraph [2] of the 23rd final provision of the LEC, which does not permit a contract or an itemisation of the debt to be provided or required in a claim in which the defendant is a consumer and where there is evidence that the sums being claimed could be based on unfair terms, compatible with Article 38 of the Charter,… [read post]
