Search for: "Does 1-95" Results 961 - 980 of 3,696
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2020, 3:24 pm by Leslie Pardo
Example 1: The classic, often-cited example of a failing to shepardize comes during the biggest pop-culture trial of the last 50 years – the OJ Simpson trial. https://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 7:32 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Warner Bros. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
A summary of existing FTTs can be found in Table 1. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Specific taxation does not require valuation and as such does not require expensive tax administration, as is the case for ad valorem where vertically integrated companies must compute a value to determine tax liability. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:37 am by David M. McLain
  Current law requires a home builder to offer to a buyer of a new home one of the following: A solar panel system or a solar thermal system;To prewire or preplumb the home for these systems; orA chase or conduit to wire or plumb the home for these systems in the future.Section 1 of the bill changes this to require that the home builder offer each of these options. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 7:00 am by Race to the Bottom
An important aspect of the deal is that because SoftBank’s capital infusion does not come with a majority of voting rights, WeWork will be treated as an “associate”, rather than a subsidiary, according to SoftBank. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
Despite the glee with which admin law academics and practitioners anticipated and met Vavilov, where does this actually leave us? [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
Note also that Jarred Karal has agreed to probation in his criminal case, but Ryan Mucaj is apparently still fighting the charges.) [1.] [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:46 am by Stephen Wm. Smith
Of course, the Supreme Court does not sit to correct every misguided ruling by a lower court. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Accordingly, because the Final Order does not actually mandate that television service providers distribute a channel that broadcasts the Super Bowl, but instead simply imposes a condition on those that already do, its issuance was not authorized by s. 9(1) (h) of the Broadcasting Act. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
” This statute, like Domestic Relations Law § 70, does not define the term “parent. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am by Eric Goldman
Building on the First Circuit’s watershed Doe v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
; see Varo, Inc. v Alvis PLC, 261 AD2d 262, 264-265 [1999], lv denied 95 NY2d 767 [2000]). [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 11:07 am by Jonathan Bailey
The world does not pivot on a dime, copyright much less than most things. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
The degree to which state tax provisions conform to the federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) varies, as does the version of that code to which they conform. [read post]