Search for: "Does 2 through 89"
Results 961 - 980
of 981
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
See ante, at 4; supra, at 2, n. 1. . . . [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
During his tenure, he directed 89. [read post]
23 May 2007, 6:18 am
The theory underlying the class action is (1) Louisiana’s coastal marshlands protect the state from hurricane damage, (2) defendants’ oil producing and transmission activities included dredging canals through these marshlands, destroying millions of acres of marshlands thereby “depriving inland communities . . . of their natural protection from hurricane winds and accompanying storm surge. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:45 pm
Further, the evidence does not establish that the Employer is a seasonal employer. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
Q: Does the Navy work with the Coast Guard? [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:05 pm
" The court says that this quote does not address the quality of FindWhat's network. 4) 12/10/03 press release: "FindWhat.com operates online marketplaces that connect the consumers and businesses that are most likely to purchase specific goods and services with the advertisers that provide those goods and services....This cost-effective, pay-for-performance model allows Web advertisers to pay only for those prospects which click-through to their sites, and… [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
When no sentence of death is imposed, an appellate court is not required to review the factual basis for a defendant's plea of guilty or nolo contendere under a heightened reliability standard. 2. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Last month we examined some pre-Roman beginnings of modern admiralty doctrine, starting from pre-history through the Greek city states. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 7:40 am
[sorry about the English - this is a mixture of Gino's English and Jeremy's editing]2. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:45 am
Of more interest is the fact that Directive 89/104, which goes no further than pushing EU member states towards a partial approximation of national (and in the case of the Benelux, regional) trade mark laws, should have ever been thought of as possessing the capacity to prevent member states regulating through statute law the terms under which registry decisions can be reviewed by the courts. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 8:02 am
Or does it? [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
It's not all that easy for the plaintiff to prove, and it can be quite an expensive proposition.Negligence per se, on the other hand, does away with this requirement because the violation of law substitutes for a finding either breach or defect. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 6:49 pm
(2) If not, does the good faith exception apply or does one of the four exceptions to the good faith exception apply? [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
(July 2, 2006)33. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 4:20 am
Council Directive 89/104 ... is to be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark can prohibit the transit through a Member State in which that mark is protected (the Federal Republic of Germany in the present case) of goods bearing the trade mark and placed under the external transit procedure, whose destination is another Member State where the mark is not so protected (Ireland in the present case), only if those goods are subject to the act of a third party while… [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
§ 470h-2(f) ("section 110(f)"). [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 8:38 am
The level and approbationary nature of the email response to the post on Moral Meltdown indicated, as poll after poll also does implicitly or explicitly, that there is great dissatisfaction with the way things have gone and are going in this country. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
For nearly two years - from June 9, 2002 until March 2, 2004, when the Department of Defense permitted Mr. [read post]
15 Sep 2006, 12:56 am
Council Directive 89/104 ... since it does not constitute a sign capable of being represented graphically and capable of distinguishing goods and services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings.(2) In any event, Article 3(1)(e), second indent, of ... [read post]
