Search for: "English v. English" Results 961 - 980 of 11,206
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 6:15 am by Astrid Reisinger Coracini
The understanding of aggression, the collective act underlying the crime, has remained virtually unchanged in GA Resolution 3314 and Article 8bis(2) of the ICC Statute since it was first introduced by a Soviet diplomat in 1933 and was found to reflect customary law by the International Court of Justice (Nicaragua v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
For this last week, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
For this last week, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1615, 1619 (2021) (Sotomayor, J.); Barton v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:29 am by Leiza Dolghih
Conclusion: Employers should use plain English, precise language to describe their non-compete restrictions, and employees should not sign an agreement unless they understand what restraints they are agreeing to, as these agreements are enforceable in Texas, when written correctly. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:29 am by Leiza Dolghih
Conclusion: Employers should use plain English, precise language to describe their non-compete restrictions, and employees should not sign an agreement unless they understand what restraints they are agreeing to, as these agreements are enforceable in Texas, when written correctly. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 3:07 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In English law, administrative decisions are unlawful if they are unreasonable, in the sense that Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation made famous. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 10:07 am
Countries gained their independence from English imperialism, but many kept their ties to the Queen who at age 21 famously devoted and pledged her life to the Commonwealth (see below at 2:21 in the video). [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:34 pm by Gregory Schick
The discission will need to provide clear, concise, and understandable disclosures which comport with the SEC’s Plain English rules. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
The judge considered the factors on secondary indications set out by Laddie J in Haberman v Jackel [1999] F.S.R. 683 (and approved by Jacob LJ in Schlumberger v Electromagnetic Geoservices [2010] EWC Civ 819). [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:39 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]