Search for: "Fields v. People" Results 961 - 980 of 4,986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
One thing that amuses the Kat is the discovery that authors with highly-specialised interests (in this case US patent law) sometimes venture out of their specialities into other, quite different fields. [read post]
2 May 2008, 8:12 pm
You never know what people in power, who seem to disdain the sacredness of private-property rights, are capable of doing. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am by Michael Grossman
” Why This Ruling is So Important Mensing laid some very unfortunate groundwork in the field of consumer protection. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
Because of this desire to narrow the field somewhat, not every paper will be selected for public posting on the workshop. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by Joe Markowitz
Most recently, in Compucredit Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 4:23 am by Sherry F. Colb
 The Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Whether domain expertise can safeguard against hindsight bias is not entirely clear, experts – specifically judges – are certainly not immune to hindsight bias.[3]Deliberation in groups does not seem to reliably reduce hindsight bias, but the research is limited and restricted to small groups (three people). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 4:27 am by SHG
In a doctrinally bankrupt decision, the Supreme Court in Michigan Dep't of State Police v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:48 am by Mike Madison
Some people are cheering and some people are shrugging in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Star Athletica v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:56 am by SHG
In yet another decision demonstrating that a judge whose career was spent prosecuting can show the fortitude to suppress, Brooklyn Justice Mark Dwyer rejected the testimony of NYC Police Officer Robert McNamara, who falsely claimed consent to justify a search of an apartment to locate a weapon.In People v. [read post]