Search for: "GAMBLE v. GAMBLE" Results 961 - 980 of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2018, 7:12 am by CMS
He further reasoned that there was no basis for treating an offer of finance for gambling differently to an offer of finance for ordinary trade, so whether the Bank knew the true purpose of the reference was irrelevant. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:27 am
On Wednesday, March 4, in No. 08-192, Abuelhawa v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:26 am by Tom Lamb
The rates of acute kidney injury (13.49 v. 5.46 per 1000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 2.52, 95% CI 2.27 to 2.79) and acute interstitial nephritis (0.32 vs. 0.11 per 1000 person-years; HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.47 to 6.14) were higher among patients given PPIs than among controls. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Colangelo writes about Gamble v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:41 am by WSLL
  The subject of gambling was not mentioned during trial. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In this piece I will discuss how if at all this provision has been altered by the case of Proctor and Gamble v Office for Harmonisation In the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ; Known simply as "Baby Dry"; and subsequent cases. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 7:21 pm by Nasseri Legal
V., which has recently been out there for a new long time and even has all of the needed licenses. [read post]