Search for: "GAMBLE v. GAMBLE"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2018, 4:54 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Michael Dorf considers the non-implications of the oral argument in Gamble v. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 4:39 am
More on Febreze/Air WickLast week the IPKat posted a short note on Procter & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser [2006] EWHC 3154 (Ch) (available here) in which Mr Justice Lewison of the Patents Court held that the packaging of Reckitt Benckiser's Air Wick Odour Stop infringed Procter & Gamble's validly-registered Community design for the packaging of Febreze (a custom-designed canister surmounted by a trigger within a housing). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:09 am
Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmCases featured:Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County v. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 7:44 am
The case of Tercica v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 9:55 pm
San Jacinto Community College v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 6:08 pm
In Kappe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 8:08 pm
" In United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 11:55 am
[US v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:51 pm
California Gambling Control Commission (gaming funds)Winnemucca Indian Colony v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 9:06 pm
The Supreme Court unanimously said no, and I think they clearly got the right result, although I fear the methodology the court used may ultimately be unhelpful for those who think that fraudulent transfer law has an important role to play in policing the fairness of financial markets and preventing against excessively risky heads-I-win, tails-you-lose gambles. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:36 am
California Gambling Control Commission (intra-tribal dispute)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmJanelle A. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:45 pm
The first case is Denezpi v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:49 am
California Redevelopment Association v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:04 pm
See Google Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The United States has taken the next step in its trade dispute with Canada and asked for the establishment of a panel to examine its complaint regarding Canada’s administration of its tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) allocations for 14 dairy products.[1] In its request, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) [2] claims that Canada’s allocation of import quotas exclusively to “producers” violates the terms of Canada’s commitments in the schedule to annex 2-B[3] of the… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 2:59 am
U.S. and the limits of Congressional delegation, Ilya Shapiro and Clark Neily on the aftermath of double-jeopardy case Gamble v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:58 pm
River Spirit Casino (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, gambling addiction)Warren v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:23 am
In 1958, in Commissioner v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:13 am
In Proctor & Gamble Co. v. [read post]