Search for: "Gay v. State"
Results 961 - 980
of 3,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2007, 1:35 pm
The case is L.W. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
Lingering state sodomy laws were invalidated in the 2003 Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 7:49 am
The decision in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 11:47 am
The unanimous panel ruled in Hasibuan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:45 am
Hodges decision, also had a massive impact on families with gay and lesbian parents. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:51 am
The only reason to oppose this bill is as a back-door means of criminalizing youthful gay relations, since after Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:51 pm
See Judgment, DeBoer, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
In a nod to LGBTQ+ Pride Month and the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 3:01 pm
Although the counsel cited Wisconsin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm
See Memorandum Opinion and Order, Love v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 8:52 am
Scheich made to an ABC News reporter about the Charney v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:46 am
Hodges mandated that all state governments recognize gay marriage. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:15 am
This was because, although the appellants had appealed to the Court of Appeal by way of case stated, they were entitled to appeal to the Supreme Court in relation to the 1988 Order because the decision involved a question as to the validity of measures of the Northern Ireland Assembly. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
Read the entire 40 page opinion in Baskin v. [read post]
10 Aug 2005, 3:23 am
The group is protesting his behind-the-scenes work [JURIST report] on Romer v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
Hodge ... and United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
Yesterday in Barnes-Wallace v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:32 pm
Gillman v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
BLAG moved to dismiss the complaint stating that Baker v. [read post]