Search for: "German v. German"
Results 961 - 980
of 5,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2014, 3:32 pm
(If you’re wondering, the other major pending decision is Kanerva v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
The IPKat has stumbled across a decision earlier this year from the Federal Court, Canada, in Pfizer Canada Inc. v Pharmascience Inc. 2013 FC 120, dating back to 4 February. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 4:13 am
If we now apply the only reasonable interpretation of "only" in the given context--a filter--to the Qualcomm v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 12:49 pm
I had a brief conversation with a senior German judge who wasn't personally presiding over the German Motorola v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 4:27 am
The Court also referred to a German Federal Constitutional Court decision (1 BvR 1248/11 of 15 December 2011), in which the German court held that the provision of a link in an online article was protected under the German Basic Law, and a Canadian decision (Crookes v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:25 am
Qualcomm opinion, and even though the Supreme Court held the Apple v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
See Lane Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 10:41 am
This includes last September's Nokia v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:44 am
In order to get that technical decision at the earliest opportunity, the German OPPO entity even waived its FRAND defense as that part would have delayed the proceedings.Nokia counterclaimed and prevailed in that Dutch case. [read post]
I'm Offended! - Advocate General Bobeck Opines on When a TM is Contrary to Morality or Public Policy
23 Jul 2019, 1:19 am
Luckily the CJEU is facing this very question, and Advocate General Bobeck gave his take on the matter very recently.The case of Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v EUIPO concerned the registration of the name "Fack Ju Göhte" (EUTM 13971163) by the film company, which is a very successful German comedy. [read post]
I'm Offended! - Advocate General Bobeck Opines on When a TM is Contrary to Morality or Public Policy
23 Jul 2019, 1:19 am
Luckily the CJEU is facing this very question, and Advocate General Bobeck gave his take on the matter very recently.The case of Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v EUIPO concerned the registration of the name "Fack Ju Göhte" (EUTM 13971163) by the film company, which is a very successful German comedy. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:22 am
The Munich I Regional Court had originally scheduled a decision on an HTC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 1:53 am
IPKat friend Rodolfo Bretscher reported on the case of the Swiss Federal Patent Court 2018/004 dated 22 October 2018.The Swiss caseIn the case of ViiV v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:04 pm
The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington held a Microsoft v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 11:09 pm
This finding, however, seems to contradict a previous decision of the German Supreme Court in Drei-Streifen-Kennzeichnung (I ZR 21/98), in which a pattern consisting of two stripes (as opposed to adidas’ three stripes) had been found to be infringing due to adidas’ significant reputation.Katfriend Kimberley Evans (Pearce IP) analysed the Federal Court of Australia’s decision in FanFirm Pty Limited v Fanatics, LLC. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court will hear arguments today in Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:26 pm
(European Commission v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 5:28 am
Meanwhile, on December 10, the first Nokia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
Michael Risch of the Written Description Blog shares his opinion on the subject and with a view to the ongoing Oracle v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 7:32 am
An ECJ review of the German application of Huawei v. [read post]
