Search for: "Grant v. People"
Results 961 - 980
of 16,996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2021, 9:22 am
But at the same time, we don’t know these people. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 3:19 pm
” See U.S. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Emily Zackin and Chloe Thurston, The Political Development of American Debt Relief (University of Chicago Press, 2024).Carol NackenoffNearly sixty years ago, Political Scientist Grant McConnell famously contended that, from the founding era, Americans have been so fixated on curbing the abuse of public power that they were blind to the insidious exercise of private power.[1] Unaccountable private associations and pressure groups frequently… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:57 pm
In Colon v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 4:50 am
Here is the opinion in People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 12:31 pm
Simply put, these individuals were the litigants from hell: the kind of people you hate litigating against.Ultimately -- and totally justly -- the trial court grants terminating sanctions against Letantia and Todd. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 3:00 pm
By Eric Goldman United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:16 pm
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 11:45 am
In People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:18 am
., LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:44 pm
If a jury believed Hoffmann's testimony that Lukowitz said that the people at the home office had told him that the "only hitch" to Joe being granted a franchise was the sale of the bakery, we think the jury could reasonably find the statement to be a promise. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 2:01 pm
. - Was I right or what about People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Garland v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:25 am
For example, in Reno v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:04 am
But Nokia v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:39 am
George, appellant NEW YORK COUNTY Civil Practice New York Does Not Have Substantial Nexus to Viagra Action; Dismissal for Forum Non Conveniens Granted Jordan v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm
As detailed in a post last Fall (see) in People v Colville (79 AD3d 189 [2nd Dept 2010]) the Second Department, without reaching a decision on the issue, engaged in detailed review of the arguments as to whether the decision to submit a lesser included offense is a fundamental one that must be made by the defendant or is a strategic one that can be made by counsel. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm
As detailed in a post last Fall (see) in People v Colville (79 AD3d 189 [2nd Dept 2010]) the Second Department, without reaching a decision on the issue, engaged in detailed review of the arguments as to whether the decision to submit a lesser included offense is a fundamental one that must be made by the defendant or is a strategic one that can be made by counsel. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:50 pm
Has the De Facto Custodian statue limited or implicitly overruled Moore v. [read post]