Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA" Results 961 - 980 of 2,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am by Trent Dykes
The bill specifically provides that California’s noncompete restrictions trump other states’ laws when an employee seeks employment in California, even if the employee had signed the noncompete while living outside of California and working for a non-California employer. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 11:18 am
  It has been seven years since the California Court of Appeal issued its wrongly reasoned and wrongly decided opinion in Conte v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:15 pm
Across California, the defense continues to argue for the application of Hanif/Nishihama outside of the Medi-Cal context. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm by Todd Aagaard
A recently invalidated Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) order regarding demand response resources may be heading toward possible resuscitation in the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:33 am by emp
The phrase “you are what you eat” popped into my head as I began this blog post. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am by The Charge
  The Hughes Court certainly seemed to head toward a general rule that states must make reasonable efforts to appoint (and thereby pay) counsel for the indigent.Yet, in Avery v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The first university case involving affirmative action was in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:08 am
Can't be.The California Court of Appeal, however, goes the other way. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of Irvine (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1110 (“Royalty”) and Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
After the 8th District’s decision last week in Wallace v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 7:47 am by Brad Kuhn
But when the California Supreme Court decided to take up Property Reserve, agencies were left scratching their heads, wondering what to do until that decision comes out (likely sometime in 2016). [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Demands for equality and freedom were met head on with arguments for morality and “traditional values. [read post]