Search for: "HOWE v. STATE" Results 961 - 980 of 80,950
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 3:59 am by SHG
” Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 25. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:57 am by INFORRM
The Judge re-stated the need to make allowance for editorial judgment, citing the principles summarised in Banks-v-Cadwalladr [2022] 1 WLR 5236. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm by Malcolm Birdling
The second prompt is the General Court’s recent decision in Case T-426/21 Nizar Assaad v Council ECLI:EU:T:2023:114. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:54 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
 Katfriend Henning Hartwig (Bardehle Pagenberg) reported on the new decision of the EU General Court on the validity of a registered Community design in light of a piece of prior art that only showed a two-dimensional view of the design.PatentsRose Hughes shared the news of the referral of three questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal on how and if the description should be used to interpret the claims of a patent when assessing patentability.CopyrightAntonios Baris… [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am by Katitza Rodriguez
When data is stored, regardless of how it would have been classified for communications surveillance purposes, the Articles 25, 27, and 28 powers can be used to target it. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Grants Pass divides about how to understand the local law. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:10 am by Hannah Rigby (Bristows)
As addressed by Richard Meade QC (as he then was) in Fisher & Paykel v Flexicare ([2020] EWHC 3282 (Pat)): if the skilled person is to be derived from the contents of the patent, one cannot create a motivation from a perceived problem in implementing the prior art unless the patent shows how to overcome it. [read post]