Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 961 - 980
of 5,732
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2020, 2:25 pm
Allen v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 11:43 am
Expense Bd. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:38 am
The Judge followed the reasoning of Lord Justice Kitchin (as then was) in Tulane v Comptroller ([2013] EWCA Civ 890), that the lump fees were “annual fees” as specified by Article 14. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
Commil USA, LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 7:00 am
Bun v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:53 am
A case in point is Warner-Lambert v Generics (UK).However, applications for second-use patents are increasing, so there must be various other incentives and efficiencies at play. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:38 am
In Apps v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Cleveland was able to effectively beat back incendiary rhetoric and dirty tricks in 1884, with opponents accusing him of having a child out of wedlock in order to jeopardize his chances of winning the presidency, but he would not be so lucky in 1888. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:07 pm
Hong KongHKSAR v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The test in Smith v Jones is discretionary. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:39 pm
Article 33 of the Chinese Trade mark Law provides that, If a holder of prior rights or an interested party holds that the trade mark application announced upon preliminary review is in violation of the second or third paragraph of Article 13(2) and (3), Article 15, Article 16(1), Article 30, Article 31, or Article 32 of this Law, he may, within three months from the date of the preliminary review announcement, raise objections to the CTMO. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:03 am
This post unpacks briefings from the defense, the government and Google (through an amicus brief) on the motion to suppress in that case, U.S. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
Hassel v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:55 am
In Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
” He has decided that he can do anything, especially because he wrongly thinks that Article II of the Constitution gives him absolute power. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:23 pm
In Pennsylvania v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
In addition to evoking memories of a time when congressional relief for unauthorized migrants was more possible, United States v. [read post]
