Search for: "Hughes v. Hughes"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2017, 2:01 am
On 27 and 28 March 2017, the Supreme Court heard the appeal of R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor & Another in which it considered whether the order imposing fees in the employment tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal is indirectly discriminatory and whether it breaches the EU principle of effectiveness. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
Samar, Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
Marcel Pemsel analysed the General Court’s judgment in Apart v EUIPO - S. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:55 pm
Wade,” Ruth Marcus, Washington Post op-ed, 4/24/20 NY Rifle & Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am
| US Supreme Court rules Official Georgia Codes Annotated is ineligible for copyright protection - Georgia v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:36 am
Jones, of US v. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 12:12 pm
Katfriends Phil Sherrell, Louise Sargent, and Shiv Gupta (all Bird & Bird) discussed the decision in WaterRower v Liking 2024 EWHC 2806 (IPEC). [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm
Montgomery County v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:53 am
Hughes in footnote 31 of her article: Auerbach v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 1:55 pm
Hughes v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:24 pm
Next Wednesday, February 24, the Justices will once again examine the regulatory realms of national and state officials, in the combined cases of Hughes v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 9:52 am
Hughes, 2007 U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
This issue’s (volume 39, number 2) article was written by Jessie Steffan while she was a law student (she is now a clerk at the District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri) and it won the Supreme Court Historical Society’s 2013 Hughes-Gossett student prize. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
This issue’s (volume 39, number 2) article was written by Jessie Steffan while she was a law student (she is now a clerk at the District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri) and it won the Supreme Court Historical Society’s 2013 Hughes-Gossett student prize. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:57 pm
Whilst Goodman and Mulcaire both pleaded guilty in respect of conspiracy to intercept voicemail messages of the three members of the Royal Household, namely Helen Asprey, Paddy Harveson and Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton, Glenn Mulcaire also pleaded guilty to separate counts of interception of voicemail communications of five other victims; Max Clifford, Gordon Taylor, Simon Hughes, Elle MacPherson and Mr Andrew. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am
The suggestion, which Lord Hughes endorsed, that this invites undue examination of “delicate and difficult” decisions is too often exaggerated. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 10:03 am
He is instructed by Marcus Farrar of Chivers Solicitors, and led by Hugh Southey QC. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:53 am
Additional decisions following Zhang include: Hughes v. [read post]
