Search for: "I v. B"
Results 961 - 980
of 24,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2025, 11:23 am
[2] See FRCP 30(a)(2)(A)(i) [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
Hochstein et al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:32 pm
US v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:42 am
I am very pleased that two cases that whistleblowers won in Tax Court (Whistleblower 21276-13W v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
I doubt the fine details of standing v. ripeness are going to be the central concern. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 10:48 pm
In an earlier post, I discussed some of the constitutional issues involved in ACLU v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 1:30 am
The post Can I change my child’s surname? [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
THEODORE B. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
Some Background Reading I’ve previously published a number of posts on the lower court decisions in Pappas and on other key decisions that may influence the outcome in Pappas: Read here my June 2008 report on the First Department’s Littman v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm
Arrive at B&B 9pm, prep, sleep, up at the crack. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 1:11 pm
In Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:33 am
Like its federal counterpart, Michigan Rule of Evidence 804(b)(2) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay In a prosecution for homicide or in a civil action or proceeding, [for] a statement made by a declarant while believing that the... [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:45 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement that: (A) a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would have made only if the person believed it to be true because, when made,... [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:46 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement that: (A) a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would have made only if the person believed it to be true because, when made,... [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:51 am
After he is convicted, the defendant learns that (a) before his trial, a juror's son informed the juror that the defendant was likely innocent, but that (b)... [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 4:07 pm
Similar to its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 804(b)(1) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for In civil cases, testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or in a... [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
" Stephen I. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:17 am
Arthur-Price v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:00 am
Rakofsky v. [read post]
