Search for: "In Interest of AG"
Results 961 - 980
of 35,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2021, 3:50 pm
Applicants who can demonstrate exceptional ability in their field despite their young age can still qualify for the NIW, for example by showing evidence of patented cutting-edge technologies, copyrights, the creation of an innovative new business, etc. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:00 pm
Several 2d District Justices found themselves in familiar surroundings this morning, in the courtroom, but in an unfamiliar location: behind the lectern, addressing a panel of AG Harris, APG Turner, and the Chief. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 5:57 am
Two recent decisions have highlighted Respondents’ legitimate interests in domain names that incorporate a holder’s trademark, by happenstance the same Complainant, SAP AG v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:31 pm
Interesting is, there is not one once of proof that [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 6:25 pm
Some of the most interesting discussion is about how to verify photography (and by extension anything else) from citizen journalists. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 4:27 am
In this "age of terror," with scholarly institutes focusing on the significance of fear, it is interesting to have two new books out that argue that this isn't such a frightening age after all. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 10:27 am
In the context of the 2025 ESIL Research Forum in Catania, some ESIL Interest Groups are inviting submissions for their online workshops. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 1:28 pm
Director Cordray indicated that the CFPB was particularly interested in obtaining input from state AGs in connection with its debt collection advance notice of proposed rulemaking. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:28 am
YO determinations are discretionary by the court for 16, 17 or 18 (less than 19) with NO prior felony, NO prior felony YO, NO prior JD plus a finding in the interest of justice. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:38 pm
Congress.gov also offers a series of educational videos on the legislative process for learners of all ages, on topics ranging from the introduction of bills to presidential actions. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 5:58 am
To learn more about State AGs’ increasing interest in this area, and how it could affect your company, read our post “State AGs Upping the Ante on Health (and Other) Information Data Incidents – Expect Increased Enforcement Actions” on Reed Smith’s Technology Law Dispatch blog. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:18 am
Age 26 Dependent coverage can be purchased with pre-tax dollars. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
What interests me at this point is how the BC courts have applied Vavilov, given the statutory scheme that applies for determining the standard of review of decisions from those administrative bodies that are subject to the ATA. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:11 am
Between more productive uses of my time, I'm hoping to circle back and comment on a few interesting things I read last week. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 8:31 am
Here are a couple of things I found interesting about the case: Role reversals. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 2:37 pm
Lawsky announced a settlement that included a $3 million civil penalty and required the defendants to refund all positive credit balances and interest charged in excess of the disclosed APR, plus nine percent interest on such amounts. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:13 am
I've been playing with the Kaiser Family Foundation Health Reform Subsidy Calculator and noticed something interesting...Scenario One: $93,000 annual income Family of 4 Age 50 No Employer Coverage Estimated annual premium: $16,858 Out-of-pocket cost after government subsidy: $8,835Scenario Two: $94,000 annual income Family of 4 Age 50 No Employer Coverage Estimated annual premium: $16,858 Out-of pocket cost: $16,858 (ineligible for subsidy)Bottom Line: At… [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 3:53 am
[UPDATE @10:52: the AG Opinion is now available here] [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 6:34 am
But an interesting phenomenon is taking place. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 2:13 pm
Interesting privilege issue bubbling in Utah, where the AG refused to release an opinion on whether Governor Herbert had the authority to set up a special election for an open U.S. [read post]
