Search for: "In Re: David Smith"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am
This same battle was already fought, and lost, back in the 1980s with Smith v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:46 pm
Smith might have to say. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 5:45 am
“You’re a criminal defendant in a case, and there are limits on what you can say,” Harbach said. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
Smith, and Charmaine Runes, researchers at the Urban Institute, examined the role of social security in reducing “economic disparities between African Americans and white families. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:05 pm
David M. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:57 am
And like everyone else, they're entitled to be paid for their efforts. [read post]
22 Oct 2006, 8:50 pm
Speaking of Harvard Law grads, whatever happened to the lawyer formerly known as David Giacalone? [read post]
11 May 2009, 8:01 am
" David Bario and Drew Combs comment on the process, starting at the beginning: It's not simply a matter of hours. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
”And, now, we're in a time when doctors are providing treatments for transgender persons. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
Darren provide further food for thoughts on the recent couple of Board of Appeal decisions G2/12 Tomatoes II and G3/12 Broccoli II, which related to an exception to patentability and which David reported on this weblog a few days ago.* BREAKING NEWS: It's official -- the law is an ASOS, or is it an ASSOS ...? [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
(Calling it secondary meaning already obscures what’s going on—it’s a disavowal of what we’re saying, which is that some symbol is functioning the way we ordinarily expect a mark to function, but we’re still not going to protect it for competitive reasons.)Grinvald: David Barnes makes a similar argument from a marketing perspective. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:27 am
As David Wiksell noted, Domestic violence victims incarcerated for refusing to testify are re-victimized by the very institutions responsible for protecting them. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 9:39 am
Roger Smith sums up the concept as follows: Legal design is a distinctive approach with the following attributes: 1. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 6:07 am
Re-create the memory. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 12:30 am
David Garrow reviews the book for The Washington Post, and Salon has an excerpt, "When SCOTUS still fixed things: What American looked like before the Warren Court. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
See In re Andrews, 52 P.3d 656 (Cal. 2002). [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 11:18 am
David Cambria opens the survey with a nice introduction. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:54 am
" "You're not welcome here, we hate you! [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
We're going to the bathroom.' Within 8 meters, they disappeared. [read post]
