Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 4." Results 961 - 980 of 1,370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2011, 6:38 am by Jeralyn
Initially registered by Stevens Express Leasing Inc and subsequently re-registered by Premier Executive Transport Services. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm by Mandelman
., and Geraldine Sheppard, 62, of Santa Ana, Calif. allegedly told employees to forge their names and notarize the signatures on tens of thousands of default notices from 2005 to 2008, which were used to initiate foreclosures, according to the Nevada AG. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
ITC limiting the downstream effect of ITC exclusion orders means complainants frequently name multiple parties when initiating complaints. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 9:37 am by Lovechilde
  There have been 13 executions since the re-institution of the death penalty in 1977, and none since 2006. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
It has been 4 months since USCIS received the petition from DOS. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:25 pm by WSLL
Appellant filed three responsive documents: a petition to revoke the will; a notice of petition for elective share; and a creditor’s claim. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Will I have trouble re-entering the United States upon my return? [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
United States (relisted after the 11/4 Conference) Docket:  11-5721 Issue(s):  Whether the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 applies in an initial sentencing proceeding that takes place on or after the statute’s effective date if the offense occurred before that date. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
  For example, you mention that when you were a law clerk under Chief Justice Vinson, the Court’s conferences [at which the Justices cast their initial votes on cases and vote on cert. petitions] ran differently than they do now. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
The terms of the settlement agreement entered into by all parties except Royal provided that the settlement "will not affect any Party’s claim, past, present, or future, against Royal" and did not require the foundation to return all the estate funds given it.4 Since the determination that Royal breached his fiduciary duty by directing the funds to the foundation after the City of Newnan declined the bequest may serve as the basis for an award of damages against Royal under… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
Finally, if you’re a tax junkie or just a fan of George Harrison circa 1966, get ready to be excited. [read post]