Search for: "In the Matter of Adoption of John Doe" Results 961 - 980 of 2,409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2018, 9:13 am by Eugene Volokh
" Thus, the First Amendment does not protect obscenity or defamation, within certain limits. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 6:53 am
John Berry, have endorsed the idea of providing health benefits to same-sex partners of federal employees. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm by Richard Hasen
The narrower plurality opinion (Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy and John Paul Stevens) agreed the law was constitutional because it appeared to burden most voters only slightly. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
A month after Virginia adopted its Declaration of Rights, Pennsylvania adopted a similar provision in its constitution. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
Of course, this does not settle the theoretical question. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Of course, this does not settle the theoretical question. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
Of course, this does not settle the theoretical question. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 11:28 am
For any questions or more information on these or any related matters, please contact Louis Lehot, John Tishler or any attorney in the firm’s corporate and securities practice group. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  In the 2012 election, millions more voted for Democrats in the House than for Republicans, but Republicans have fixed House Congressional districts so that it does not matter. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"4 The Court explained that “It is well established that "an arbitrator has broad discretion to determine a dispute and fix a remedy and that any contractual limitation on that discretion must be contained, either explicitly or incorporated by reference, in the arbitration clause itself'," citing Matter of State of New York [Dept. of Correctional Servs. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm by Bob Corn-Revere
It was adopted to protect the integrity of the judiciary by “maintaining the public’s confidence in an impartial judiciary. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 9:32 am by Guest Author
Even so, that does not finally resolve whether a declaratory judgment may be granted against a President. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:44 am by David Pocklington
This provision does not apply to Chancellors but, it has also been held that, if it had done, it Chancellors would have added nothing to the existing duty and practice of In reaching my decision/ I have had due regard to the role of the church as a local centre of worship and mission, a matter which must be highly relevant to a case of this kind. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:07 am by Steve Hall
Apparently, so does the prospect of signing the order for the hanging. [read post]
Our Working Group’s members may write to the Commission separately on whether, as a matter of policy, the proposal should be adopted or modified; those matters are beyond the scope of these comments. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
Attorney matter -- the notion that because the subject matter of the investigations is presidential removal of the U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:09 am by Dianne Saxe
Rather, the SCC has adopted a flexible approach to the admissibility of novel scientific evidence. [read post]