Search for: "Irish v. Irish"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
CG v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm
IP Holdings v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm
He made plenty of incriminating statements to Irish authorities that I am not going to republish here. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
Bensaid v. the United Kingdom (Application no. 44599/98, Feb. 6, 2001). [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
Ciaran TONER v the United Kingdom – 8195/08 [2011] ECHR 375 (15 February 2011): Northern Irish prisoner fails in Euro human rights challenge against refusal to allow him to vote as he missed voting registration deadline and was therefore too late in bringing claim. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am
As a result, by excluding French companies that are the same as Irish companies except for their groups’ global revenues, the DST discriminates against Google Ireland and other similar Irish technology companies. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
Similarly, Suk explores German and Irish constitutional developments for reimagining our post-Dobbs settlement. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 12:24 am
Koh's upcoming ruling following the FTC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:08 pm
In that context, I remember how Judge Robart in Microsoft v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 4:03 pm
The decision in Sinnott illustrates that in Irish law, no less that in England (Theakston v MGN [2002] EWHC 137 (QB) (14 February 2002); Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457, [2004] UKHL 22 (6 May 2004)) and under the European Convention on Human Rights (Peck v UK 44647/98, (2003) 36 EHRR 719, [2003] ECHR 44 (28 January 2003); von Hannover v Germany 59320/00, (2005) 40 EHRR 1, [2004] ECHR 294 (24 June 2004)), it is no longer an answer (if it ever was) simply to… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:42 am
In Moses v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
Some sources, like the Irish Province of the Order of the Carmelites, state that the martyrdom of Valentine took place on February 14, 269 or 270 ACE. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:26 am
The Irish Government’s decision to engage directly with the ICJ is important in two ways. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:56 am
They’re still miffed about women suffrage, the Civil Rights bill and Roe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:32 am
Closer to home, here’s hoping that what has been happening in the UK helps to expedite proactive efforts to implement mooted clinical initiatives in Irish law schools. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
The mostly poor, mostly Scots-Irish “crackers” who spilled into the Panhandle had no patience for government. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:25 am
The Irish courts have taken a paternalistic and weak approach to vindicating the rights of persons subject to the mental health legislation as was aptly illustrated in the recent judgement of P L v. [read post]
