Search for: "Jane Doe #2" Results 961 - 980 of 1,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
The challenged provisions amended the Internal Revenue Code by adding: (1) a "penalty" payable to the Secretary of the Treasury by an individual taxpayer who failed to maintain adequate health insurance coverage and (2) an "assessable payment" payable to the Secretary of the Treasury by a "large employer" if at least on of its employees received a tax credit or government subsidy to offset payments for certain health-related expenses. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:11 am by Guest
Getting high-quality testimony from an expert witness does not have to be hard. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm by Adrian Lurssen
The purpose-driven law firm: What market role does your firm really serve? [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm by Laurie Lin
He does corporate work at Gibson Dunn.The Case Against: - Gibson’s website continues to look like it was designed in 1752 by Benjamin Franklin.Emily Feinstein and Eric Olney (Buy them a seder plate.)The Case: - Good grief, more Columbia Law. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:35 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The indictment is summarized as follows: Counts 1 through 90 - production of child pornography using Jane Doe one Counts 91 through 107 - production of child pornography using Jane Doe two Counts 108 through 114 - attempted production of child pornography using Jane Doe three Count 115 - possession of child pornography "ICE HSI is working closely with local law enforcement to target individuals who are engaging in child pornography crimes… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:35 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The indictment is summarized as follows: Counts 1 through 90 - production of child pornography using Jane Doe one Counts 91 through 107 - production of child pornography using Jane Doe two Counts 108 through 114 - attempted production of child pornography using Jane Doe three Count 115 - possession of child pornography "ICE HSI is working closely with local law enforcement to target individuals who are engaging in child pornography crimes… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:15 am by EEM
It will cover themes such as: Conceptualizing climate change-related movement; The nature of movement – what does the evidence tell us? [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:11 pm by Eric
Jane Cunningham that sought to impose stricter limitations on contact between teachers and students. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:00 am by Lara
So, on the very same day that blink-182 released its Up All Night fan montage video on YouTube, “rewarding its fans for copyright infringement,” it also filed a federal trademark infringement lawsuit against John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company in US District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s not anomalous, but does represent a community conflict. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:03 pm by David Lat
As Jane Genova wrote at Law and More:The open nature of campus life and its nearby areas has made the university vulnerable to incidents of violence, even murders. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
Three years later, on the evening of October 2, 2008, Eric Katz filed his wrongful death and medical malpractice suit against Washington University Medical Center, Barnes-Jewish and John and Jane Doe, as medical providers. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:27 am by David Lat
Jane Kucera (Harvard 2008 / Gorsuch)Justice Elena Kagan 1. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:16 am by David Lat
Jane Ginsburg: Like her mother, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Jane Ginsburg is a queen of legal academia. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:34 am by admin
  Yet standing between the redevelopers and their visions of sugar-condos are the lichen-like economic cryptobiotica of small businesses, who are annoyingly stubborn when it comes to protecting what they see as their property rights, as profiled in No more ‘blight blanket’ eminent domain: Part 1, does this look like blight to you? [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:25 am by Cari Rincker
 Having a written contract does not mean that you do not trust the other person. [read post]