Search for: "Kerr v. State" Results 961 - 980 of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am by Jack Chin
United States (U.S. 2013) cited it and two other scholarly articles to show that the historical evidence contradicted Apprendi v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:57 am by Nathaniel Sobel
United States (holding that the use of a thermal imager to detect heat radiating from home was a search), United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Kiran Bhat
Jonathan Stempel of Reuters, Orin Kerr at the Volokh Conspiracy, and Adam Liptak of The New York Times preview tomorrow’s arguments in Florida v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 6:01 am by Rosalind English
For Lord Kerr, it was an indispensable prerequisite that there must be some means of ascertaining the reason that the right to legal assistance has been waived [53]. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:18 pm
: An Analysis of the Federal Circuit's Materiality Standard Under the Patent Doctrine of Inequitable Conduct Elizabeth Peters Felony Murder, the Merger Limitation, and Legislative Intent in State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:03 am by SHG
After the 9th Circuit’s en banc ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
Kerr-McGee Oil and Gas Corp. (09-54). [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 3:29 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Professor Kerr, who is cited by the court, explains in depth and offers thoughts on the consequences of this. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:17 pm by Inside Privacy
Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108, 118 (2d Cir. 2011). [4] United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:39 am by Katharine Lammiman
Supreme Court The appeal will be heard today by a panel of five judges comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Toulson. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog (via How Appealing), Orin Kerr offers some reactions to the oral argument. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
In finding for the Claimant, Mitting J stated “…The impression given by the postings to the ordinary reader was a significant and distorting overstatement of what had in fact occurred. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Others much more qualified than I have analyzed the debate, so see these folks for much meatier, more lawyerly analyses:Orin Kerr, Volokh Conspiracy: "Reflections on the Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]