Search for: "Klein v. Klein" Results 961 - 980 of 1,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
Here, the record establishes that Hecht, who was retained by George Breen to draft a legal document, was not in privity or near-privity with the plaintiff (see Fredriksen v Fredriksen, 30 AD3d at 372; Goldfarb v Schwartz, 26 AD3d 462, 463, 811 N.Y.S.2d 414; Rovello v Klein, 304 AD2d 638, 757 N.Y.S.2d 496). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:02 am by kevin-vonkamecke
Klein, No. 03 CV 1570(BMC)(RML), 2008 WL 4682208 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Proximate cause is established by demonstrating that the plaintiff would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence (see Rudolph, 8 NY3d at 442; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010 [1996]). [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:08 am by Peter Margulies
The report, co-authored by CNAS CEO Michele Flournoy and Senior Fellow Adam Klein, rejects the common trope of surveillance policy as a zero-sum game between security and privacy. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:25 pm by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Hawaii v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:51 am by Ben
v=9eN0CIyF2ok And finally, remember Re-Digi? [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 4:37 am by Jordan Brunner
Josh Blackman studied the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit’s panel opinion in Washington v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:08 am by Florian Mueller
The Munich I Regional Court ("Landgericht München I" in German) just announced the first final judgment on a Qualcomm v. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am by Matthew Kahn
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]