Search for: "Little v. USA"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
L.R. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:17 am
Murphy Oil USA (here). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
Perfect Web v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Mensing, in which the United States Supreme Court couldn’t find a federal statute or regulation in support of granting generic drug manufacturers legal immunity and so contrived an argument the Court admitted “makes little sense,” or Garza v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:47 am
Little did they know what a court would deem important in deciding who ultimately controlled their properties. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“[A]nimal studies are of so little probative value as to be inadmissible. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
By reading Justice Blackmun's infamous dictum in Jones v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
The Council for Public Interest Law set up by the Ford Foundation in USA defined "public interest litigation" in its report of Public Interest Law, USA, 1976 as follows: "Public Interest Law is the name that has recently been given to efforts provide legal representation to previously unrepresented groups and interests. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 12:53 pm
” (footnotes omitted)); Abry P’rs V, L.P. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:59 pm
In WIC Radio Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am
This seemed to have been confirmed by the decision, not long afterwards, in Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:54 pm
Fehribach v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
If you download thousands of lines of source code from your employer's computer system, you can't be convicted of theft under the National Stolen Property Act since the source code, being intangible, isn't "property" that is capable of being stolen: you can read the ruling of the Second Court of Appeal in USA v Sergei Aleynikov here. [read post]
Refusing to cede control of LinkedIn group supports noncompete, trade secret claims against employee
1 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
However, the court dismissed the contract claim based on an employee handbook and an ITSA claim over communications exchanged on LinkedIn among other claims (CDM Media USA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:03 am
Dee V Benson, US Dist. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 9:34 pm
The opinion concerns section 163 of Division B of Public Law 111â€"68, which must have been enacted on a day that the guy who usually comes up with improbable acronyms (PROTECT Act, USA PATRIOT Act, the SNIFF Act, the PUMP Act, etc. etc.) was out sick. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:01 am
(Imagine your grandchildren asking incredulously, “You mean the Volkswagen ‘V’ used to mean peace? [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 3:08 am
Supreme Court, in a June 2006 decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:03 am
Dee V Benson, US Dist. [read post]
