Search for: "London v. State"
Results 961 - 980
of 4,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
A TRANSCRIPT OF THE COMMENTARY IN THE FIRST TELEVISED UK TRIAL R V KEVIN PIETERLAG AND JOHNNY ‘ROBBERS’ ROBBER Charon QC: Good morning everybody…Welcome to The Old Bailey on day one of a five day trial in the case of R v Kevin Pieterlag and Johnny ‘Robbers’ Robbers. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:22 am
Fifth, it is not for the court to “search around” for a justification that the policy maker has not advanced: R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence at (131). [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:43 am
Bano, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Waltham Forest (2024) EWHC 654 (Admin) Waltham Forest owed Ms Bano the full housing duty. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 12:44 pm
In a brief memorandum opinion, the New York Court of Appeals (the state's highest court) today affirmed the Appellate Division's decision in Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm
Mrs Trump’s case against the Daily Mail in the High Court in London continues. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
A Court of Appeal case, concerning eligiblity for housing assistance via EU status London Borough of Harrow v Ibrahim & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 386 (21 April 2008) The facts are, briefly, Mrs Ibrahim is a Somali national, married to a Danish national. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:05 pm
The London Borough of Croydon v Lopes [2017] EWHC 33 (QB) Costs on settled s.204 Housing Act 1996 appeals – the issue that never goes away. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 3:32 am
"The lawsuit also accuses the association of violating state and federal racketeering laws.The complaint filed August 15 in U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:04 am
” Hanson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 4:02 pm
State of Victoria v Pacific Technologies (Australia) Pty Ltd (ACN 065 199 439) (No 2) [2009] FCA 737 '); //--> [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 6:10 am
New London Board of Education, a summary order decided on August 21. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 11:18 am
With the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Kelo v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 5:02 am
City of New London. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
The key conclusion which the Judge comes to is that the state of the law on this issue is currently ‘uncertain and in flux’, and so ‘probably requires the attention of an appellate court’ ([107]). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
Kat friends Nina O'Sullivan and Victoria Wilson from Mishcon de Reya in London report on these developments. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:34 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
