Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 961 - 980
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2012, 5:03 pm
re v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The state is under various obligations under Article 2. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:03 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clarke v R [2012] EWCA Crim 9 (20 January 2012) Oliver, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3114 (21 December 2011) Lawrence, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3129 (16 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civi Division) Eastenders Cash & Carry Plc & Ors v HM Revenue & Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 15 (20 January 2012) Star Reefers Pool Inc v JFC Group Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 14 (20 January 2012) Charnock & Ors v Rowan &… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am
Lord Hope based [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:51 am
The court went on to state that the Lord Ordinary had a reasonable evidential basis for finding on an objective analysis that the bank made a legally binding promise in the telephone call of 14 June 2007 to provide development finding. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:55 am
Lord Wilson dismissed it on the basis that information held predominantly for the purposes of journalism was exempt, and that the Balen Report fell under this category of information. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 am
In giving the lead judgment for the majority, Lord Neuberger stated the terms in clause 19(2) which outline the stress test to identify if a CDE has occurred, had to be treated as a reference to the new CRD IV Directive requirements instead of only being applicable to the old requirements under CRD I Directive. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:50 pm
McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ B1 (29 April 2010) – Read judgment or our previous post Case comment Lord Carey of Clifton, responding to Lord Justice Laws’ observations in MacFarlane, has called this latest dust-up about religion in the courts a “deeply unedifying clash of rights“. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
In a lengthy dissenting judgment, Lord Justice Sales disagreed with the application of the defence stating that the difference between his view and that of the majority was that he considered greater weight should be given to the rights of the trade mark owner and the protection of the interests of the relevant public. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
On 29 November 2018 the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, David Gauke, issued a statement, “Controlling the costs of defamation cases”. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:33 am
Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 at 381; and see AXA General Insurance Ltd at [32] (Lord Hope DPSC) and [131] (Lord Reed JSC). [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Supreme Court decision Lord Hodge, with whom Lord Neuberger, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes agreed, gave the judgment of the court. [read post]
17 May 2016, 8:19 am
” [11] The Court unanimously rejected the MoJ’s appeal, Lord Reed giving the judgment. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
