Search for: "MICHAEL BARNES" Results 961 - 975 of 975
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2007, 7:17 am
Michael Stevens of Kentucky Law Blog comments:Family law is tough because the choices hard, the emotions high, and the consequences grave for all concerned. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 2:07 pm
At the Commentary blog, "Contentions," Williams College art historian Michael J. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 11:17 am
Board member Michael Kozuch, a Wheatfield resident, voted against the measure. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 8:21 pm
Stone, Barry Andrew Strom, Peter David Supple, Stacey Elisabeth Teas, Mark Pilgrim Tourangeau, Michael David Verrill, Renee Margaret Villandry, Erin Louise Ward, Susan Elizabeth Welch, Jennifer Williams, Michael Stephen Williams, and Stephen Forrest Young. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Barber, Bryant Barchet, Alison Barker, Michele Barnard, Pat Barnes, Ruthlyn M. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 9:00 pm
When pressed to elaborate, Irvin remarked, and I quote: "[Maybe] his great-great-great-great-great-great-grandma pulled one of them studs up out of the barn [and said], 'come on in here for a second.' " Irvin has since apologized for his remarks. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 6:29 am
.'' Cockrum on Thursday pointed to strong language in a concurring statement by appeals court Judge Michael Barnes: "There is not a whit, not an iota, and not a scintilla of evidence in the record that (Planned Parenthood) has failed to report suspected abuse.'' "That pretty much says it all,'' Cockrum said. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 1:50 pm
The essays explore both the emergence of law in multiplayer online games and how we can use virtual worlds to study real-world social interactions and test real-world laws.You can buy a copy at Amazon.com or Barnes and Noble. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 6:51 am
Dionne and Michael Cromartie and written by James Davison Hunter and Alan Wolfe. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 3:48 am
Sharon Barnes and Tim Barnes, Plaintiffs-Appelles, v. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
That is not the issue of proportionality as such - proportionality as such is the situation where a commander, without any special or extra intent of wanton and depraved destruction, was nonetheless found liable under the laws of war for destruction because the court simply found it disproportionate as such.)The full declaration from which this is drawn can be found on SSRN, here, and the reply declaration to the plaintiffs experts (Michael Reisman and I were experts for the defendant… [read post]