Search for: "MILLS v. STATE" Results 961 - 980 of 2,204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
  The Seventh Circuit applied the state’s safe harbor to a drug-related consumer fraud claim in Bober v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm by Eric
* Copyright enforcement mill gets caught red-handed committing copyright infringement on its website. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:59 pm by Paul D. Swanson
Further, there is no loss of state control over any of the run-of-the-mill disputes that state bar associations already exercise in matters of professional responsibility. [read post]
6 May 2019, 1:32 pm by Giles Peaker
Granted in Southwark v Mills, it was a pre-existing lack of soundproofing that enabled the level of noise, so the issue of altering a property in such a way as to increase the level of noise transmission is factually different, but at the same time, the argument that the works to the floor were the nuisance, and the subsequent noise the consequence, is not at all straightforward. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm by Giesela Ruehl
There is no better example of this interaction than the Shape v Supreme litigation ongoing before Dutch courts, with the most recent decision in this dispute rendered in December 2019 in Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (“SHAPE”) et al v Supreme Site Service GmbH et al (Supreme), COURT OF APPEAL OF ‘s-HERTOGENBOSCH, Case No. 200/216/570/01, Ruling of 10 December 2019 (the ‘CoA Decision’). [read post]