Search for: "MOORE v. MOORE" Results 961 - 980 of 5,270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
  The Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC) has recently announced hearings designed to push forward legislative agendas in the US Congress to produce measures targeting Chinese central authority policies in Hong Kong and Xinjiang. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
Moore, requiring the government to prove unlawful distribution of a controlled substance “outside the usual course of professional practice” and “for other than a legitimate medical purpose [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 2:58 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
ShareMythological creatures and French literary heroes appeared during argument in Thompson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 10:47 am by Emily Dai
And Robert Loeb and Cesar Lopez-Morales wrote about United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
"Allowing different remedies in state law cases heard in federal courts on pendent jurisdiction would undermine the 'twin aims of the Erie rule: discouragement of forum-shopping and avoidance of inequitable administration of the laws.'" LaShawn A. by Moore v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 1:52 pm by Jennifer Lynch
We also voiced these concerns in the amicus briefs we filed in Mora and Moore-Bush. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 9:48 am by Stephanie Farrior
Hilary Charlesworth, the Harrison Moore Chair in Law and Laureate Professor at Melbourne Law School and a Distinguished Professor at Australian National University, served on the ICJ as judge ad hoc for Australia in Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 6:33 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In Moore v Instow Enterprises Ltd, (2021 BCSC 930) (“Moore”), a British Columbian employee was entitled to less notice than the standard amount of one month per year of service mainly due to his failure to mitigate his losses. [read post]