Search for: "MURPHY V US" Results 961 - 980 of 1,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
Fox, 492 U.S. 469 (1989) (`[i]t is not the usual judicial practice, however, nor do we consider it generally desirable, to proceed to an overbreadth issue unnecessarily-that is, before it is determined that the statute would be valid as applied’); Murphy v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by Seth Kreimer
The Court flirted with (and Justice Murphy would have accepted) the Spiderman Theory of state action. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am by John-Paul Boyd
As a result, it occurred to me that it might be useful to take a somewhat more positive, rights-based approach to the role of litigants within the justice system and the expectations they are entitled to have as to how they will be treated. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
(The case was entered into the court system under the name Van Valkerburg rather than Van Valkenburg or Quinn, so the briefs use Van Valkerburg.) [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 9:15 am
Do let us know what you think! [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
  For those looking to learn more about this area generally, a good place to start is with this article by Joe Murphy in a recent issue of Compliance & Ethics Professional. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 7:48 am by Ken White
" Bently Reserve L.P. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am by Mark Ashton
Last month brought us the decision of the U.S. [read post]