Search for: "Majors v. Smith"
Results 961 - 980
of 3,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2012, 8:05 pm
Smith, 494 U. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:11 am
Smith, 494 U. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:13 am
The justices heard oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:47 am
However, by a majority (Dame Janet Smith dissenting) the Court held that the claimant could not rely on the FAA because the head of damage under German law, the loss of the right to maintenance, did not correspond to compensation for loss of dependency, the head of damage under English law. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
I am in the process of revising my admiralty syllabus, and one case that I’m going to teach next year is Kotch v. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
The vast majority of these came from information in the TECS database. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:49 am
In the case giving rise to the current opinion, a Court of Appeals majority again found no error in State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
To decide the issue, the Court reconciled two Sixth Circuit cases, Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The Court, by a 2-1 majority, answered both these questions, as well a third question, in the negative. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 2:28 pm
Everyone on the panel -- Judge Alarcon (who authors the opinion), Judge Milan Smith, and Judge Hurwitz -- is on board for this one. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:50 am
Railroad Commission of Texas and Pioneer Exploration, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am
Of course, such decisions can and this one is indeed going to be appealed--which is also a safe assumption with respect to an even higher-profile recent FRAND ruling by the same court, Mr Justice Marcus Smith's Optis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:48 pm
" In a Strongly worded dissent Judge Lippman, joined by Judges Ciparick and Jones, both of whom had been in the majority in Wilinski together with Judge Smith who was the swing vote in this case opined, inter alia; " The majority misapplies this Court's recent holding in Wilinski v 334 E. 92nd Hous. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:57 am
The justices added Alexander v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
Kentucky and Smith v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am
Smith did modify – without overruling – the Warren Court’s Sherbert v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
First, her majority opinion in Mohawk Industries v. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Smith and Desmond King, America’s New Racial Battle Lines: Protect versus Repair (University of Chicago Press, 2024).Alexandra Filindra In America’s New Racial Battle Lines: Protect v. [read post]
