Search for: "Martin v. State" Results 961 - 980 of 4,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2019, 10:34 am
But now as a Justice, he doesn't need (or want) these, echoing the point that case law is the real authority to be citing, and what he needs to draft opinions.Today's DJ has Bill would force state court judges to write candidate statements: A bill proposed last week would require state Supreme Court and appellate justices to file candidate statements when standing in a retention election.Here's a blog post with Advice for lawyers preparing their first oral… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:40 pm
§ 1125(c))• Count V - Federal Cybersquatting - ACPA and Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Hargraves and Title IX   Book Session: Doctors and Demonstrators: How Political Institutions Shape Abortion Law in the United States, Britain and Canada, by Drew Halfmann  Ziad Munson -- DiscussantZakiya Luna -- DiscussantDrew Halfmann -- Creator, Organizer, AuthorIsaac Martin -- Chair, DiscussantDrew Halfmann  -- Author Southern Law  Tamara Myers -- Network Rep, Creator, OrganizerBarry Godfrey -- Chair, DiscussantMegan Francis, The Strange Fruit of the… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 1:43 pm
Martin O'Malley asked for in his State of the State address in January. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:36 am
Continuing its tradition of thoughtful (and often divided) post-Booker work, the Sixth Circuit today in Valentine v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am by John Elwood
Second is Martin v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 6:47 am by INFORRM
Judges Răduleţu and Guerra Martins partly dissented, in particular being of the view that the Article 6 complaint should have been declared admissible. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:19 pm by Walter Olson
New Oxford vice chancellor speaks out against threats to free inquiry as well as overregulation of universities [Iain Martin, CapX] Feds: get in line on Title IX or we’ll yank your institutional science funding [Inside Higher Ed, background on Title IX] More on scheme proposing mandatory oppression studies for first-year students at American University [Robby Soave/The Daily Beast (and thanks for mention), earlier] Back to the days of Plessy v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:50 am by Ben Vernia
As this site reported then, Campbell received a relator’s share of $8.75 million in 2003 for two qui tam suits against Lockheed Martin Corp. [read post]