Search for: "Matter of A.D"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
The applicable rule, 22 NYCRR 1400.3, mandates that an attorney in a matrimonial matter file a copy of the signed retainer agreement with the court, along with the statement of net worth. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
What matters is what courts say. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
., statutory, appointment status and the actual jurisdictional classification of the position to which he or she has been appointed and the actual seniority to which he or she is entitled as a matter of law.The key word is “actual” because the failure of an employer to accurately identify the employee’s statutory appointment status and seniority or the statutory jurisdictional classification of the individual’s position does not affect the employee’s legal and… [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:53 am
From the early 13th century, the court required the accused to seek its jurisdiction over a matter voluntarily before it could hear the case. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:48 am
., 148 A.D.2d 324, 325, 538 N.Y.S.2d 539 (N.Y. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
Concerning name-clearing hearingsBrowne v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 04583, Decided on May 25, 2010, Appellate Division, Second Department [Browne II]In general, a name-clearing hearing is to provide an employee who claims that he or she has been “stigmatized” by his or her employer with an opportunity to clear his or her name* The individual seeking such a hearing has the burden of proof in the proceeding.Typically the individual seeks a name-clearing hearing if he or she… [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:05 pm
Ct. 2013), aff’d, 112 A.D.3d 1379, 976 N.Y.S.2d 921 (2013) (grand jury investigations and subpoenas constitute a “written demand … for non-monetary relief” and investigations constituted “criminal proceedings for monetary or non-monetary relief” sufficient to trigger coverage); MBIA Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:44 am
A.D. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Mars,19 A.D.3d 195, 797 N.Y.S.2d 49 (2005), that a parent may assert legal malpractice as an affirmative defense, at least “to the extent of challenging that portion of the fees attributable to advocacy, as opposed to guardianship. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:08 pm
Needless to say, it did not matter; the children were clearly in safe hands. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:54 am
Failing to do so was a fatal defect and the court ruled that vacating the award and remitting the matter to a new arbitrator for reconsideration was proper. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:45 pm
Nies, 96 A.D.2d 166; 468 N.Y.S.2d 278; 1983 N.Y.App.Div Lexis 20313. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 8:28 pm
Although the parties could not have conferred subject matter jurisdiction upon the Family Court, no public policy precludes a prior agreement to extend the effect of any Family Court decision beyond the reaches which that decision is permitted by law. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
Lodder and A.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 12:23 pm
McCoskery as mediator to assist them in resolving various matters attendant to their divorce. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:50 am
Nieves, 197 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. [read post]
15 Dec 2012, 4:49 pm
Social Services [211 A.D.2d 21] Law § 383-c became effective January 1, 1991. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 1:41 pm
CEJJ, Inc., 152 A.D.2d 69, 71, 547 N.W.S.2d 699 (N.Y. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Does the FDA’s conclusion call off preemption no matter what were the reasons behind the conclusion, or whether those reasons were earlier known by the defendant? [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
The court also held that defendant's statements involved a matter of public concern, such that plaintiffs were required to prove actual malice. [read post]
