Search for: "Matter of Bright"
Results 961 - 980
of 5,381
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2020, 11:55 am
Setting the Stage As the November 2020 presidential election approaches, it is worth imagining how a foreign adversary might attempt to intervene in the domestic political process. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Translational similarity matters: same meaning in different language could bar registration. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:25 pm
The exemptions frequently require that anyone who uses them must be acting in "good faith," an imprecise term that can be a matter of opinion when corporate interests conflict with those of researchers. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 3:59 pm
It is extremely difficult for a single law to draw a bright line between what data a user is entitled to and what constitutes an invasion of another’s privacy. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:21 am
In my own direct experience since remote working became the norm as a result of covid I can think of a number of similar errors (a guardian saying ‘oh shit’ loudly when her wifi was intermittently not working – which unfortunately was working at the moment she uttered the expletive, a colleague muttering the F word thinking he was muted but being heard by the judge, a party’s legal representative describing her client during a break as ‘not very bright’,… [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:45 am
There are four categories of people under 18 with matters that never fall under juvenile jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
Thanks to Caroline Mala Corbin, Janet Halley, Rick Hills, Nan Hunter, Douglas Laycock, Micah Schwartzman, and Steven D. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:09 pm
Often, the “concerted” boundary is less than a bright line. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:27 pm
In the Court's view, there is a strong public interest in shining a bright light on Mr. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:14 am
”Derbyshire County Council said: “We apologise if they were offended but it is the job of our registrars to advise in these matters as sometimes people are not aware of certain meanings or associations around certain names. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
As an economic matter, you didn't really "make" any money in 2018, since you spent $25,000 and made $25,000. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:40 am
This interesting aspect of patent law – which on the facts encouraged English patent lawyers to imagine the scenes in Mr Berardi’s garden, with blue skies and presumably a bright green, beautifully watered lawn – had the scope to alter the traditional test for what constitutes a public disclosure. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
The matter was thus unanimously remanded for further proceedings on the plaintiff’s free speech claim. [read post]
Working with Tech from Home Efficiently, Ethically and Securely in the Legal Profession [Guest Post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:13 am
As Massachusetts moves through phases of reopening while Covid-19 spikes across the United States, lawyers continuing to work from home can take this opportunity to ensure they’re operating efficiently, ethically, and securely. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
Step two: the movant must be “entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
There is no rigid formula for determining whether the plaintiff falls within the ministerial exception, and thus far the only cases the Supreme Court has resolved in this area involve plaintiff-teachers responsible for imparting certain religious principles to their students.The idea behind the ministerial exception is that "The First Amendment protects the right of religious institutions 'to decide for themselves, free from state interference, matters of church government as well… [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 6:55 pm
If possible, the light should be diffused so that you aren’t washed out by the bright lights. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:49 am
Ward, Employment Law Subject Matter Expert/Legal Writer and Editor Want to read more in-depth law in brief stories like this? [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
Importantly, FLSA2020-6 provides no “bright line” guidance. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
On June 25, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam, an asylum-seeker, does not have a constitutional right to habeas corpus review in federal court of his claims that the government violated his constitutional, statutory and regulatory rights in issuing an order for his expedited removal. [read post]
